Monday, January 20, 2014
Happy MLK Day
Today is Martin Luther King Jr. day here in the US. He is clearly the most important person in the Civil Rights Movement of the mid-20th century in this country and arguably the most important American of that century, as well. His story is indeed an awesome and impactful one. If all you know is the "I Have a Dream" speech, do yourself a favor and read up on the man.
Since you're here, I imagine movies are your thing. There have been a few attempts to dramatize the life of MLK. There have been some decent ones. The most notable effort is probably the 1978 TV miniseries entitled King starring Paul Winfield in the lead role. The best offerings are a number of the documentaries made about him and the Civil Rights Movement as a whole. Apparently, there is a new biopic in the works that Oliver Stone was connected to until a few days ago. Hopefully, capable people get involved in this film and it gets to see the light of day.
As King relates to this blog, I have reviewed a number of movies, many of which are documentaries, about people who are fighting for someone's civil rights in some fashion. The range of these movies spreads across race, gender, sexual orientation, even species. Click on the titles below (listed alphabetically) to read my reviews of these movies.
12 Angry Men
42
Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry
The Black Power Mixtape, 1967-75
The Central Park Five
The Cove
The Help
How to Survive a Plague
Inherit the Wind
The Invisible War
Kinyarwanda
Lincoln
Red Tails
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Movies I Grew Up With: Krush Groove
The story of the love affair between this particular movie and
myself really begins a couple years before it was even released. In 1983, I
became enamored with a group called Run-DMC beginning with their song “Here We
Go.” Over the next year and a half I learned just about every word of both their
debut self-titled album and their sophomore effort, “King of Rock.” I took the
title song of the second album as my personal anthem.
Late summer, or early fall of 1985, I began seeing TV ads
for a movie starring my heroes called Krush Groove. Yes!
Not only was Run-DMC starring, but other hip hop legends such as Kurtis Blow,
The Fat Boys, Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, and even Prince’s latest ‘it’ girl,
Sheila E. There was also this young rapper I’d just started listening to.
Perhaps you’ve heard of this guy. He calls himself LL Cool J. Even though they weren't in the commercials, I'd be remiss if I failed to mention that the Beastie Boys and New Edition also appear. Needless to say,
seeing this movie the day it hit theaters was priority number one. I started
putting the word in with Mom, right away. In the way fourteen year olds often
tend to, I let her know I would literally keel over and die if I didn’t see this
movie as soon as it came out. Repeatedly.
Lo and behold, when opening night came Mom had to work third
shift. She was a corrections officer at Riiker’s Island on rotating shifts in
those days. There was no way she was going to take my siblings and I, plus my
best friend and his little brother to the movies before having to pull an
all-nighter at one of the nation’s most notorious prisons.
Thankfully, she planned ahead.
At the time, a friend of Mom’s was having some trouble
getting on her feet so she was staying with us. Mom asked her to drag us all to
the theater that night so that I wouldn’t die. At least, I think that’s why.
Anyhoo, we arrived at Sunrise Theater, on Sunrise Highway of course, to find a
line wrapped around the building for Krush Groove. At this
point, our guardian for the evening asked me what I thought was the single
dumbest question in the history of mankind. She said “Wow, look at this line.
You guys sure you wanna stay?”
“You’re joking, right?” At least, that’s what I was
thinking. I can’t remember exactly what I said, but I’m sure it was along the
lines of “Hell yeah!” Okay, maybe not. The point is we stayed. We got in to the
show we were trying to get into. Shortly after the movie started, so did the
rock-rap hybrid “King of Rock.” Life was good.
The actual plot of Krush Groove is
loosely based on the early days of Def Jam Recordings, the company founded by
Russell Simmons that put him on the path to becoming a multi-media mogul. For the
uninformed, he is the real life brother of Joseph Simmons, AKA Run of Run-DMC.
He was actually the main character of the movie. Curiously, but wisely, he did
not play himself as all the artists did, including his business partner Rick
Rubin. Russell was played by Blair Underwood. There’s sibling rivalry, loan sharks, a love triangle, and of course, plenty of hip hop involved.
There was also plenty of comic relief whenever The Fat Boys
were on the screen. Their show-stopping music video plopped into the middle of
the film for “All You Can Eat” is just hilarious. Actually, just about
everything they did had me in stitches. They were such an effective part of the
movie, their performance earned them a collective multi-picture deal.
Unfortunately, they only made one more movie, the flop
Disorderlies where they co-starred alongside Ralph
Bellamy.
Recently, during one of those rare times when there was not a “new to
us” movie lying around the house, my family and I were trying to decide on a
movie to watch. The proverbial light bulb came on over my head as I thought ‘hey,
my wife and daughters love movies with lots of music and my son is a rap fan so
let’s watch Krush Groove!’ When I said it out loud, I got
mixed reactions but they agreed to watch.
Personally, I’ve seen it probably a couple dozen times since
that night in 1985. My wife has seen it quite a bit also, but hadn’t watched it
in a while. Of course, it was all brand new to our young’uns. As I suspected
they had a grand time watching it. Granted, part of their fun was laughing at
80s fashion, but they still enjoyed the movie. They recognized some of the
songs from my playing them around the house when I get in a nostalgic mood, so
that was a plus.
Looking at it with my now more critical eye, I can much more easily
see its flaws. For one, letting all of these artists play themselves was
clearly a ploy to capitalize on their success in the musical arena. For the
most part, they’re horrible actors. There are also a few plot holes to be
found. Additionally, I am a little bit of a hip hop historian and this movie
takes serious liberties with the facts even though most of the people involved
know them much better than I. That said it is still lively and entertaining.
Helping tremendously with this is the fact that the stuff with The Fat Boys
still works. I still laugh. My kids also laughed. More importantly, they
laughed in the right spots.
This movie also has one of my favorite cameos of all time.
One scene shows the guys sitting around the office and auditioning acts. Just
as they decide they are done for the day, a young man and his two buddies push
their way in the door. It’s that LL guy. He says “Box!” One of his boys turns
on the boom-box and he launches into the first verse from “I Can’t Live Without
My Radio,” one of his earliest hits. Then he disappears from the movie just as
fast as he showed up. To this day, it’s an intense and exciting forty-five
seconds or so of film. Of course, he went on to an incredibly long and
successful career in rap and later parlayed that into more longevity and
success as an actor. Think about this: he starred in In the
House, a sitcom that ran for four seasons, almost twenty years ago
and has worked steadily as an actor ever since. I’ve always been a big fan of
his, but must admit I will always harbor just a bit of hate for him. It’s not
really his fault, per se, and she’ll never admit this, but I suspect my wife
would seriously consider leaving me for him if presented with the opportunity. Damn
you, James Todd Smith. Damn you.
The true testament to the fact that this movie still works
is the way my kids reacted when it was over. When I put it in the DVD player,
they thought they were doing me a favor by tolerating “one of dad’s old people
movies.” By the time it was over, they were humming “All You Can Eat,” and
talking about their favorite parts. They asked me to explain much of the 80s
slang that permeates the dialogue. The wife and I reminisced on the good ol’
days. And all of us marveled at how much muscle Mr. LL has packed on since then. However,
I really got my biggest confirmation that I’d introduced them to the right
movie a few months later. I was at the computer banging out a post for this
blog while my girls were in the next room trying to figure out what they wanted
to watch. Without me saying a word, they picked Krush
Groove.
Friday, January 17, 2014
The Hangover Part III
Directed by Todd Phillips.
2013. Rated R, 100 minutes.
Cast:
There is a scene in The Hangover Part
III in which a bunch of characters wake up from a night of
debauchery in a strange place, wondering what they did and how they got there.
Sadly, this happens at the end. Before this, you may spend a lot of time
thinking you’re watching the wrong movie.
Let me explain.
Right away we know things are going to be different this
time around. Instead of starting with a scene such as the one described above,
the way the first two installments did, we kick things off with a prison break.
It’s Mr. Chow (Jeong) escaping from a Bangkok jail. We quickly transition back
to the USA where Alan (Galifianakis) is spiraling completely out of control due
to the sudden death of his father. After some convincing, he agrees to enter a
treatment facility, provided he is driven there by his buddies in the Wolfpack.
Together, they hit the road, but they never make it. They get run off the road
by Marshall (Goodman) and his goons, including Black Doug (Epps) from the first
movie. Marshall informs them of Chow’s escape and that Chow stole $21 million
is gold from him. He then kidnaps their Doug (Bartha) and demands the rest of
them find and bring Chow to him. The boys trying to do precisely that ensues.
Rather than another joke-a-minute recap of the night before
we get a clunky hybrid crime thriller and dark comedy. Our heroes feel like
they are way out of their element. In fact, Phil (Cooper) and Stu (Helms) take
a back seat most of the time to whatever is going on with Chow and Alan. Almost
none of this is funny. The biggest reason is that these two characters are the
least able to support a movie. Truthfully, none of them are which is, in part,
what makes the first two movies work. They are a true ensemble effort where
each contributes equally to the overall cause. Here, two of them are forced
into the lead and wind up exposing their own flatness. This is especially
problematic with regards to Chow. We have always been told he is an internationally
wanted criminal. This is one of those rare cases where showing instead of
telling backfires. When we were only told of his nefarious life, it works okay.
When we’re shown this, it fails to hold water. Everything about him is simply
too ridiculous.
As a whole, The Hangover Part III feels
like an overreaction to criticism of Part II. Conventional wisdom says that its
predecessor was too similar to the original. Truth told, it is a carbon copy. As
blatant duplications go, however, it’s still a winner in my book. I didn’t
laugh quite as often as I did the first time around, but I still laughed an
awful lot. At the end of the day, that’s all I really want from my comedies.
Sitting through the third installment yielded very few chuckles. I fully
understand that comedy is highly subjective. What is funny to me might be
deplorable to you, and vice-versa. Therefore, had the humor simply been of a
different brand I would better understand the effort. It feels like this movie
didn’t really try. It’s as if the powers that be thought that these characters
were so great that they could effectively carry any story and stepping away
from the franchise’s bread and butter wouldn’t be much of an issue. Turns out
they can’t carry any old plot, particularly this one. Fish out of water tales
can be wonderful. They usually focus on one fish trying to gain his/her footing
in a new environment. In this case, all of the fish are out of water and we
just watch them flop around for an hour and a half.
MY SCORE: 3/10
Click on the titles below to see my reviews for...
and
Thursday, January 16, 2014
The Incredible Burt Wonderstone
Directed by Don Scardino.
2013. Rated PG-13, 100 minutes.
Cast:
Jay Mohr
Michael Herbig
Mason Cook
Luke Vanek
David Copperfield
As a kid, Burt Wonderstone (Carell) receives a “magic kit”
for a birthday gift and eagerly learns every trick in it as fast as he can. He
soon amazes Anton (Buscemi) and the two bond over their love of magic and grow
up to be wealthy and world famous magicians. However, after ten years of
headlining a Las Vegas show together, things have gotten stale. The passion is
no longer there. Worse yet, ticket sales are dwindling as their dated act has
been marginalized by a popular, and possibly psychotic, street magician named
Steve Gray (Carrey). Think Criss Angel mixed with David Blaine. After a stunt
to reclaim their relevance goes horribly wrong, Bert and Anton break up. Anton
travels the world doing humanitarian work. Sorta. We focus on Bert who is not
only out of work, but also broke and trying to figure out how to get back in
the game.
Steve Carell is the absolute perfect person to play Burt
Wonderstone. He embodies the character to such a degree we totally buy into
this guy’s plight. He manages this while simultaneously ensuring we don’t
really like him that much. There is no denying that Burt is a class A jerk.
However, we always understand him to be a guy who has lost his way. This is
what keeps us invested in the movie. We want to see if our hero can find
himself again.
Burt’s quest is greatly enhanced by the surrounding
characters. Most notable are Jane (Wilde) and Steve Gray. They function as the
angel and devil on Burt’s shoulders. Wilde is solid as a love interest and
really isn’t asked to do much, but does ground Burt. Jim Carrey more than makes
up for her as Burt’s big competition. He plays Gray as a totally unhinged
parody of “modern” magic. Not to be outdone, Alan Alda shines as the yoda-like
Rance Holloway. No, he is nothing like the master jedi in demeanor or
personality, but his status in this world is similar. Alda plays it with his
trademarked gruffness. Somehow, he is simultaneously dismissive and caring.
This makes him lovable. As Burt’s partner-in-magic, Buscemi is much tamer than
usual which serves the movie well. The same could be said for the late James
Gandolfini.
None of this would matter if the movie were not funny.
Personally, I laughed quite a bit. A good deal of the jokes are double
entendres. Others are pop culture references. Those dealing with tricks
performed by Steve Gray are disgusting. Even the people in the movie recognize
this. That self-awareness adds humor to them so they work. As a matter of fact,
the movie is aware of all of its own absurdity. This knowledge of self adds an
all-encompassing layer of sarcasm to the proceedings. In any event, most things
are at least worthy of a snicker. This helps things move smoothly.
That it moves so fluidly is a huge plus in favor of
The Great Burt Wonderstone. It knows that it is shallow
and light and doesn’t pretend to be anything different. As long as you don’t go
searching for something deeper, you will have an enjoyable time.
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Pointless Lists: Top 10 Portrayals of Real Women
In my last post I reviewed the 2002 film
Frida (here) which is a biopic about the late Mexican artist
Frida Kahlo. I gushed about how amazing Salma Hayek was in the title role. This
got me to thinking about a number of other great performances of real women
that have graced our screens. Of course, my next thought was where does Hayek’s
rank, if at all. This is no definitive list as it is only based on movies I
have seen. Still, these are my…
Top 10 Portrayals of Real
Women
Honorable Mentions:
(alphabetically by actress’ last name)
Hope Davis as Joyce Pekar in American
Splendor
Faye Dunaway as Bonnie Parker in Bonnie and
Clyde
Mariel Hemingway as Dorothy Stratten in Star ‘80
Lynn Whitfield as Josephine Baker in The Josephine
Baker Story
10. Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II
In
The Queen
(2006)
As the iconic monarch Helen Mirren brings tremendous grace
and dignity to the screen. Watching her really feels like we are looking at
Queen Elizabeth II wrestle with the idea of how to address her nation about the
passing of Princess Diana whom she is known have her differences with. Mirren
was also outstanding as Alma Reville, the wife of The Master of Suspense in
2012’s largely lackluster Hitchcock.
9. Michelle Williams as Marilyn Monroe
In
My Week with Marilyn
(2011)
Williams captures Marilyn’s fragility and the manner in
which she wields her sexuality as the only weapon she feels comfortable using.
It’s remarkable work that threatens to reduce Monroe to a caricature but
manages enough humanity to make her a sympathetic figure. (Review)
8. Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher
In
The Iron Lady
(2011)
As usual, Meryl Streep keeps us engaged. She again
demonstrates her ability to get lost within the character and draw out both
their despair and their dignity. Like a number of others on this list, she also
breathed life into another historic figure. In her case, she was delightful as
culinary legend Julia Child in 2009’s Julie & Julia. (The Iron Lady Review)
7. Cathy Moriarty as Vicki La Motta
In
Raging Bull
(1980)
Moriarty quite literally came from nowhere to earn an Oscar
nomination for playing the wife of boxing great Jake La Motta opposite Robert
De Niro. It was a fiery performance nearly as raw and visceral as her iconic
co-star.
6. Jennifer Lopez as Selena Quintanilla
In
Selena
(1997)
Lopez is simply phenomenal as the Mexican-American singer
who achieved superstar status in Mexico and appeared to be on the verge of a
breakthrough in the United States before being gunned down by the president of
her fan club. She brings an abundance of energy to her role and makes us love
her. This is still her best work.
5. Reese Witherspoon as June Carter
In
Walk the Line
(2005)
It takes a tough woman to handle The Man in Black. In
Walk the Line, Witherspoon gives us that plus a whole lot
more. She was ridiculous feisty and perfect all the way through. By the way,
give her extra kudos for doing all of her own singing.
4. Salma Hayek as Frida Kahlo
In
Frida
(2002)
Salma Hayek is an unstoppable force of nature. She emanates
an irresistible flame that torches the screen. Aided by a prominent unibrow,
Hayek is simply impossible to look away from. It is a magnificent performance
starting with the very first time we see her.
3. Hilary Swank as Brandon Teena
In
Boys Don’t Cry
(1999)
Swank’s role is, in my mind, the second most challenging on
this list. After all, she’s playing a woman who isn’t sure she was really meant
to be one. Swank does a masterful job making us feel empathy for a person whose
actions eventually cause pain in others. Ten years later, Swank would also play
famed aviator Amelia Earhart. (Review)
2. Angela Bassett as Tina Turner
In
What’s Love Got to Do with It
(1993)
Right before our eyes, Angela Bassett morphs from being a
shy country girl from Nutbush, Tennessee to one of the most iconic women in the
history of American music who also happens to be desperately trying to figure
out how not to be a punching bag for the husband that made her a star. It’s a
powerhouse performance if ever there was one and I will go to my grave saying
Bassett was robbed of the Oscar for Best Actress in 1993. In a quieter role
just one year earlier, she was also excellent as Betty Shabazz, the wife of
slain Civil Rights leader Malcolm X.
1. Charlize Theron as Aileen Wuornos
In
Monster
(2003)
The one role on this list more inherently challenging than
Swank’s in Boys Don’t Cry is Theron’s, here. Physically,
she literally transformed herself. Always the glamorous sort with classic
Hollywood beauty, she was just about unrecognizable. For the role, she gained
thirty pounds and shaved her eyebrows. And that’s before all the makeup and
prosthetics were applied to her. But that was only the beginning. She still had
to sell us on the idea that she was a serial killer. Theron certainly managed
to do just that with a flat-out disturbing performance.
I’m sure I have missed one or a dozen. Let me know some of
your faves.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Frida
Directed by Julie Taymor.
2002. Rated R, 123 minutes.
Cast:
Valeria Golino
Diego Luna
Mía Maestro
Saffron Burrows
The life and times of real life Mexican artist Frida Kahlo
(Hayek). We meet her as a young woman spying on an extra-marital affair by
Diego Rivera (Molina), her country’s most famous artist. A short while later,
Frida is badly injured when the trolley she is riding in has an accident.
Doctors tell her she may never walk again. Of course she does, and it indeed
affects her the rest of her life, but this isn’t the story. The story actually
begins with her discovering her passion and ability for painting while confined
to her bed. Soon, she seeks the counsel of none other than Rivera whom, if you
couldn’t tell, is as renowned for his womanizing as he is for his artwork. The
two embark on a tumultuous lifelong love affair.
In the titular role, Salma Hayek is an unstoppable force of
nature. She emanates an irresistible flame that torches the screen. Aided by a
prominent unibrow, Hayek is simply impossible to look away from. It is a
magnificent performance starting with the very first time we see her. Since one
great turn deserves another, what Hayek accomplishes is certainly complemented,
and might not be possible, without the work of Alfred Molina as Rivera. He is
essentially the perfect trampoline for her to bounce off. Seemingly everything
she does is in reaction to him, even when he is not in the scene. To his
credit, Molina doesn’t wither in her storms. He plays Diego as a large man,
both literally and figuratively, with enormous pride and appetites. This isn’t
a guy who curls up fetally when his woman is on a tirade. He constantly reminds
her, and us, that she knew who he was right from the start.
Along the way, director Julie Taymor adds some very nice
touches that are nods to artists in general, and these two in particular. At
times, characters themselves fade in or out of a painting. Other times, Frida’s
work literally comes to life. On a few occasions, even less conventional things
happen. It’s a wonderful way of adding layers to the film without endless
exposition. Showing is more powerful than telling. The film does a great deal of
showing this way and manages to do so without subtracting from the idea that we
are watching a movie about real people.
One area where the movie doesn’t do enough showing or telling
is in regards to how she came to be so important to the Mexican people. We’re
told often how good her work is, but just piles up in a back room of her house.
Diego often lets well connected people give it a look. Eventually, this lands
her a gig in Paris. Next thing we know she’s suddenly an icon in her native
land. We never see any growth in her status. We are just told it is.
Even if the movie could have done a better job at explaining
the public side of her life, it so thoroughly and zestfully goes over the
private side, we can’t help being enthralled. Here is a woman with so much
passion it rubs off on everyone around her, including us in the audience. We
lover her regardless of whether or not we are into art or agree with her
politics. This is the towering achievement of Frida.
Friday, January 10, 2014
2 Guns
Directed by Baltasar Kormákur.
2013. Rated R, 109 minutes.
Cast:
Greg Sproles
We meet Bobby (Washington) and Stig (Wahlberg)
Reservoir Dogs style, sitting in a diner having a fun
conversation and planning a bank robbery. They also go to see Mexican Cartel
boss Papi Greco (Olmos) in order to make an exchange of fake passports for
cocaine. That doesn’t go quite as planned. Quickly, we find out that Bobby is
not who he seems. He is a DEA agent and all of this is part of his plan to take
down Papi. In his grand scheme, Stig is just collateral damage. He is to be
arrested after the bank robbery. In reality, the robbery goes off without a
hitch, because Bobby’s people fail to show. Additionally, what was supposed to
be three million dollars, at most, turns out to be forty-three million. $43.125
million, to be exact. And everyone is trying to get their hands on it. Then,
there is the little matter of Stig’s actual identity. Or who anyone is, for
that matter. Basically, everyone trying to kill everyone else over this money
ensues.
2 Guns hastily becomes one of those
movies where all the good guys are dirtier than the bad guys, providing no safe
haven for our heroes. The tougher task for the viewer is figuring out who isn’t
crooked. The various angles from which the characters approach things plays out
in elaborate fashion. Every few minutes gives us a new reveal which sends the
movie careening in another direction. This is interesting for a while, but gets
to be a bit much.
On the plus side, the movie recognizes where its strength
lies. It is within the personas of our two leads. Denzel does Denzel and
Wahlberg does Wahlberg. Turns out, the two have great chemistry. Together, they
are just fun to watch. We laugh often at their exchanges and wonder why it has
taken so long for them to work together. Because of them, as I am sure it was
intended, the whole thing has a Lethal Weapon or
Bad Boys vibe that works really well. Regardless of the
plot’s machinations, we can enjoy watching two guys who appear to be having a
blast.
The other major strength of 2 Guns is
something true to the title. Between all the cheeky banter of the good guys and
sinister posturing by everyone else we get lots of action. Things go boom real
good and at fairly regular intervals. The best sequence, in my opinion,
actually features our heroes squaring off against one another via car chase.
Somehow this includes fisticuffs between them while both vehicles are moving.
Please do not try this at home.
When all is said and done, 2 Guns is a
fun movie that rides its two stars to whatever success it enjoys. We are spared
their life stories in favor of the chatter that entertains us pretty well. As
mentioned, this chatter is aided by the action. It all works to mask its
over-populated and convoluted story and does a good job. If ever a movie could
breeze by on charm and personality, this is it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
























