1980. Rated PG, 127 minutes.
Cast:
Christopher Reeve
Margot Kidder
Jackie Cooper
Sarah Douglas
Jack O’Halloran
Valerie Perrine
Marc McClure
E. G. Marshall
Finally, Lois Lane (Kidder) figures out that Clark Kent is
indeed Superman (Reeve). With this little secret now out in the open, at least
between the two of them, they declare their love for one another and live
happily ever after. Well, not quite. Clark finds out that to be with Lois, he
has to give up his powers and live as one of us mere mortals. Apparently, why
isn't important because he never asks. He just plops his in-love ass in the
chamber that zaps him into being a regular dude then promptly hops into bed
with his favorite intrepid reporter. There is only one little problem with all
this bliss. Our hero soon discovers what we already know: General Zod (Stamp)
and his two minions have arrived on Earth with designs on running the joint. In
case you’re not familiar with this bit of Superman lore and don’t remember him
from his cameo in the first Supes movie, Gen. Zod is an evil SOB that was
banished from the planet Krypton for basically the same thing. Here on Earth,
of course, he and his subordinates, Ursa (Douglas) and Non (O’Halloran), have
the same powers Superman had before he zapped himself. Realizing this normal
guy crap literally doesn't fly, Clark figures out how to get super again and
takes on the terrible trio.
In true sequel fashion, the focus is more on action this
time around. It is spread throughout as opposed to being back-logged to the
film’s latter stages like in its predecessor. It makes this a fun movie. Of
course, with all that action comes more reliance on special fx. The problem
with this is those fx have aged very poorly. In the first movie, the biggest
problem is that Superman doesn't always look like he’s really flying. Most
other things still look decent. Here, flying is still an issue, but multiplied
with four characters having the ability of flight. Additionally, Zod and
friends wreak lots of havoc, but much of it is too clearly fake. It gives the
movie a cheesy look.
Still, archaic technology is not this movie’s biggest
problem. I can chalk that up to it being made in 1980, with much of it actually
shot in 1977 and 1978 while the first movie was filming. The story takes
shortcuts and often throws logic to the wind in favor of hurrying to the next
action sequence, or dropping in some comic relief. For instance, Lex (Hackman)
and Miss Teschmacher (Perrine) make it to the North Pole from Metropolis in a
couple days traveling first by hot air balloon, then on foot. Largely, this is
to set up later events, but also so we can get a hearty laugh out of seeing
Miss Teschmacher pull a dog sled while Lex yells “Mush!”. I haven’t even
mentioned that none of us human folk seem particularly cold when they get
there, by the way. These sorts of things go on quite regularly. Unfortunately,
Otis (Beatty) only makes a cameo appearance this time around so the laughs
don’t go over so well. Even worse, we only get to many of these scenes because
someone, usually Lex, intuits something he shouldn't. I don’t care if he is
“the greatest criminal mind of our time.”
Lots of this film’s problems stem from the fact that the
director of the first film, Richard Donner was fired before he could finish
filming this one. As stated, he had actually shot much of it simultaneously
with the first movie. It is generally estimated he completed three quarters of
the movie before being dismissed. Reasons for his firing vary depending on who
you ask, but one thing that’s often mentioned is the tone of the movie itself.
It seems the powers that be wanted to make it a more fun, possibly campy,
affair while Donner wanted to take a more serious approach to the material. They
brought in Lester who filmed the remainder of the movie, most of it with that
lighter approach, slapped the two parts together, and voila! Superman
II.
Despite all this, this is still an entertaining watch. The
fact that it turned out as well as it did is remarkable. Along the way, we get
a number of now iconic scenes. There’s the sequence at Niagara Falls with our
hero performing two rescues, one as Superman and one as Clark. There is also
the moment Lois realizes for certain that the two men are one and the same.
Later, there are Clark’s two fights against a trucker in a diner. The first, a
now powerless Clark taking a brutal beating, makes us really feel the extent of
his sacrifice for Lois. His first battle with Zod and crew is still epic, aged
fx and all, as is the climactic scene with all of the principals at Superman’s
home. Finally, there’s the memory wiping “super kiss.” These all work
wonderfully and can make us forget, or gloss over, the movie’s weaker points. Okay,
the “super kiss” is silly, but you get the idea. Of course, we have another
stellar turn by Christopher Reeve in the titular role. And with three of the
most memorable words ever spoken by a movie villain, “Kneel before Zod,”
Terence Stamp makes himself a legend in Superman annals.
Hmm, the rose colored glasses through which we glimpse the
past. I was reminded of this while watching Superman II. I
may as well come clean before continuing. When I watched this as a youngster, I
thought it surpassed its predecessor in every way imaginable. Its heavier focus
on action clearly had a hold of me. I’d seen both movies at least half a dozen
times each by the time I was thirteen, plus another half dozen times or so over
the next fifteen years. Until this past week, I hadn't seen either in its
entirety in over a decade. And no, I've never seen “The Donner Cut” of the
film. Nonetheless, I proudly championed this as the best superhero flick of all
time until Tim Burton’s Batman came out. Even after all
these years, I still felt it was one of the top ten the genre has ever seen. I
still enjoy it, but let the truth be told. It just doesn't hold up as well as
its predecessor.
Now that you point them out, I realize the film has more issues that I thought. I agree on the flying, it was quite painful to watch, and Terence Stamp doesn't play Zod, he is Zod. Simply amazing. I liked this one more than the first probably because of the action; the first was just too slow and perhaps my expectations were too high.
ReplyDeleteThis is the more fun of the first two. I won't deny it. Just a lot of things going on that I thought could have been done better.
Delete