Showing posts with label James Bond. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Bond. Show all posts
Friday, July 15, 2016
Friday, June 21, 2013
Skyfall
Directed by Sam Mendes.
2012. Rated PG-13, 143 minutes.
Cast:
Bérénice Marlohe
Ben Whishaw
Ola Rapace
Bill Buckhurst
Skyfall opens with the death of James
Bond (Craig), in spectacular fashion, of course. No worries, or spoiler alert
necessary. His condition doesn't last long. After all, this is a 007 movie. You
just can’t go killing him before the opening credits. Besides, both MI6 and M
(Dench) are in great danger. Who else is gonna save the day? However, the
genius of this movie is that it’s not really so simple as the hero saving the
day, despite appearances.
Someone has stolen a list that reveals the identities of all
of MI6’s undercover agents around the world and is fond of sending M personal,
if cryptic, messages. This is a big problem, as you might imagine. The already
difficult task of retrieving this list and/or tracking down the person
responsible is made that much more so by the fact that our hero is suffering
from fairly significant physical and emotional issues.
Beginning with Bond himself, extending to M, the entire
movie is a dissertation on old vs. new. The franchise itself has long
understood that its main character is a relic of the Cold War. He is even
referred to as such in one of those abysmal Pierce Brosnan outings. Here, the
point is driven home. MI6 is under fire from its own government for being
antiquated and clinging to its old ways. We’re also reminded numerous times
that Bond is not of this generation. His time seems to have past. As evidence,
his edges are more frayed than ever before. Daniel Craig continues to play the
role brilliantly, both as a man and a super-spy. With three 007 flicks under
his belt, it’s debatable whether or not he’s the best Bond ever. It’s
inarguable that his is the most human rendition of the character. And the actor
is not alone on his quest to make this true. He’s been given scripts that not
only allow him to bleed, but to actually feel.
No matter how much emotion our hero has to deal with, it
couldn't be a great Bond movie without heart-pounding action and an eccentric
villain. The action is terrifically ridiculous. All manner of vehicle is given
a whirl, most notably trains. Lots of fun with trains. There’s lots of exciting
hand-to-hand combat and plenty of shooting. Oh, and we have some rather large
man-eating lizards. The only drawback in the action department is the best
sequence opens the movie. We keep hoping something will top it, but none can.
What happens with the helicopter during the last big set gets closest. Still,
it’s all loads of fun.
As far as our bad guy, Silver, he’s gleefully played by
Javier Bardem who brings his usual excellence to the role and has fun with it.
Unfortunately, he may have a little too much fun. Silver comes off more
amusing, if creepy and eventually pathetic, than menacing. True, he puts our
hero into some harrowing situations. I’m just not so sure he inspires feelings
of dread. That’s a bit disappointing since the same actor gave us one of this
century’s most frightening film villains in No Country for Old
Men.
Luckily for us, this is the rare Bond film that doesn’t sink
or swim based on its bad guy. That’s because, at the end of the day,
Skyfall is probably the most self-aware Bond film ever
made. Of the three Daniel Craig entries into the canon, two of them are
excellent. The first, Casino Royale, is a brilliant series
reboot. Also self-aware, it purposely avoids the cheesiest and most over-the-top
aspects of the franchise. Most noticeably, Bond’s gadgets, which the Brosnan
flicks were overrun by, are nowhere to be found. In their absence we begin to
delve into the psychology of the character along with the action. This is where
some tenets of Bond, such as his love for scotch, are no longer seen as just
things that a cool and manly super-spy does. Quantum of Solace, an incoherent mess, is the oddball. It’s somewhat
enjoyable, but a far cry from its predecessor. Skyfall is
a return to greatness. It continuously questions its own place in today’s
world. It questions the way its hero and, by extension, the movie itself goes
about its business. It even gives us a few gadgets, simultaneously paying
homage to Bond’s glorious past and wondering whether they have any place in his
future. Even M must face this same judgment, both explicitly by members of
Parliament and within the film’s subtext. Much more than just another Bond
flick, or an excuse to showcase shootouts and car chases, this is a movie that
recognizes the status of its protagonist as a pop-culture icon and his battle
to stay relevant.
Labels:
007,
Action,
Albert Finney,
Daniel Craig,
Espionage,
James Bond,
Javier Bardem,
Judi Dench,
Naomie Harris,
Ralph Fiennes,
Sam Mendes,
Skyfall,
Spy
Monday, April 13, 2009
Quantum of Solace

Quantum of Solace
2008. Rated PG-13.
Director: Marc Forster. Starring Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Olga Kurylenko, Mathieu Amalric, Giancarlo Giannini, Gemma Arterton, Jeffrey Wright, David Harbour.
Plot: An attempt on M's (Dench) life by the mysterious Quantum organization leads Bond (Craig) to Haiti where he meets the beautiful Camille (Kurylenko). She in turn, leads him to Quantum's leader Dominic Greene who is of course, trying to take over the world in some form or fashion. Action ensues. Or re-ensues, since it starts with a car chase, but nevermind.
The Good: The action, duh! These sequences will flat knock you on your butt. It amplifies the Bourne-style in splendidly brutal fight and chase scenes with amazing stunts. However, it's careful to never get into the gizmo heavy cheesefests that marred the Pierce Brosnan 007 flicks. This Bond also has another thing in common with Bourne, he's ruthless, in fact moreso. He's piling up quite a body count. To pull this off, Daniel Craig is perfect. Whether or not he's the best Bond is a matter of opinion. What isn't open to debate is the fact that he's given us by far the most athletic version of the character. Aside from the physical stuff, we also notice that for the first time, a Bond movie isn't a stand-alone adventure. It's actually a real sequel that often refers to it's predecessor. This further humanizes our hero, even as he's performing unbelievable feats. He often has thoughts of revenge and can't sleep due to the events of the prior movie. The relationship between Bond and M continues as it did in Casino Royale as well. That is, it provides a solid foundation and seems to grow during the movie. It helps that Judi Dench has been wonderful in the role.
The Bad: The story is convoluted and rushed. This seems to be a constant Bond problem as the bad guy has to go through a whole lot to take over the world and Bond has to go all over the world, quite literally, to figure things out. As a result, he seems to discover a lot of things either by accident or unintentionally implied psychic ability and we are left scrambling to catch up. The movie is also formulaic. In CR, there were long sections of the movie devoted to us getting to know the new Bond. Here, those sections are stripped away and we just follow the same leftover steps. As far as Bond villains go, Dominic Greene and the evil general we meet later are a bit bland. If the Bond reboot needs anything, it's "a better brand of criminal" to quote The Joker. Oh, and what happened to the creative names for the bad guys and the Bond girls. Hearing the outlandish and sometimes racy names of these characters was part of the fun. I realize they wanted to get away from some of the more silly aspects of the franchise but they could lighten up just a tad. Dominic Greene and Camille? Where's the fun in that?
The Ugly: He keeps tearing up my Aston Martins!
Recommendation: As with any of the Bond movies over the course of 40 years, it's a must-see for fans. It's also a must-see for action fans since it may be the genre's best film of 2008 that doesn't include a costumed hero (unless you consider a well-tailored suit a costume). It's also not as good as CR. While, it's certainly a fun ride, the movie between the action scenes is lacking. Fortunately, those action scenes come early and often and are all dynamite.
The Opposite View: Mike McGranaghan, Aisle Seat
What the Internet Says: 7.0/10 on imdb.com (4/6/09), 65% on rottentomatoes.com, 58/100 on metacritic.com
2008. Rated PG-13.
Director: Marc Forster. Starring Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Olga Kurylenko, Mathieu Amalric, Giancarlo Giannini, Gemma Arterton, Jeffrey Wright, David Harbour.
Plot: An attempt on M's (Dench) life by the mysterious Quantum organization leads Bond (Craig) to Haiti where he meets the beautiful Camille (Kurylenko). She in turn, leads him to Quantum's leader Dominic Greene who is of course, trying to take over the world in some form or fashion. Action ensues. Or re-ensues, since it starts with a car chase, but nevermind.
The Good: The action, duh! These sequences will flat knock you on your butt. It amplifies the Bourne-style in splendidly brutal fight and chase scenes with amazing stunts. However, it's careful to never get into the gizmo heavy cheesefests that marred the Pierce Brosnan 007 flicks. This Bond also has another thing in common with Bourne, he's ruthless, in fact moreso. He's piling up quite a body count. To pull this off, Daniel Craig is perfect. Whether or not he's the best Bond is a matter of opinion. What isn't open to debate is the fact that he's given us by far the most athletic version of the character. Aside from the physical stuff, we also notice that for the first time, a Bond movie isn't a stand-alone adventure. It's actually a real sequel that often refers to it's predecessor. This further humanizes our hero, even as he's performing unbelievable feats. He often has thoughts of revenge and can't sleep due to the events of the prior movie. The relationship between Bond and M continues as it did in Casino Royale as well. That is, it provides a solid foundation and seems to grow during the movie. It helps that Judi Dench has been wonderful in the role.
The Bad: The story is convoluted and rushed. This seems to be a constant Bond problem as the bad guy has to go through a whole lot to take over the world and Bond has to go all over the world, quite literally, to figure things out. As a result, he seems to discover a lot of things either by accident or unintentionally implied psychic ability and we are left scrambling to catch up. The movie is also formulaic. In CR, there were long sections of the movie devoted to us getting to know the new Bond. Here, those sections are stripped away and we just follow the same leftover steps. As far as Bond villains go, Dominic Greene and the evil general we meet later are a bit bland. If the Bond reboot needs anything, it's "a better brand of criminal" to quote The Joker. Oh, and what happened to the creative names for the bad guys and the Bond girls. Hearing the outlandish and sometimes racy names of these characters was part of the fun. I realize they wanted to get away from some of the more silly aspects of the franchise but they could lighten up just a tad. Dominic Greene and Camille? Where's the fun in that?
The Ugly: He keeps tearing up my Aston Martins!
Recommendation: As with any of the Bond movies over the course of 40 years, it's a must-see for fans. It's also a must-see for action fans since it may be the genre's best film of 2008 that doesn't include a costumed hero (unless you consider a well-tailored suit a costume). It's also not as good as CR. While, it's certainly a fun ride, the movie between the action scenes is lacking. Fortunately, those action scenes come early and often and are all dynamite.
The Opposite View: Mike McGranaghan, Aisle Seat
What the Internet Says: 7.0/10 on imdb.com (4/6/09), 65% on rottentomatoes.com, 58/100 on metacritic.com
MY SCORE: 6/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)