Showing posts with label Blake Lively. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blake Lively. Show all posts
Monday, June 27, 2016
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Savages
Directed by Oliver Stone.
2012. Rated R, 142 minutes.
Cast:
Aaron Taylor-Johnson
Diego Cataño
Joaquín Cosio
Sandra Echeverría
Every successful operation, especially those of a criminal
nature, needs both brains and brawn. Ben (Taylor-Johnson) provides the former
while Chon (Kitsch) handles the latter. Together, these two grow and distribute
some of the world’s best weed from their house on Laguna Beach. They also share
a girlfriend. Her name is Ophelia, but she goes by O (Lively). She’ll explain
the whole sharing bit if you decide to watch. The point is, the boys are so
successful they've attracted the attention of a Mexican cartel run by the
brains of Elena (Hayek) and lots of brawn, mostly provided by Lado (del Toro).
They want to partner with our heroes who don’t exactly cooperate. Of course,
this means Elena and crew respond by putting their damsel in distress and
kidnapping O. Oliver Stone ensues.
If you can’t already tell, Savages sets
a frenetic pace from the get-go relenting occasionally to let people yell at
each other. This comes complete with lots of quick cuts and a blaring
soundtrack. To Mr. Stone’s credit, he uses them to great effect. They aid his
story-telling in a way that’s not quite as intrusive when used in lots of other
movies. There is also some pretty vivid violence which is what people watching
this movie have come for.
There are two things that detract from
Savages in a major way. First is how the leads are
handled. Second is letting one of them, O, narrate. She makes a tremendous
effort to be profound but comes off as a babbling pot-head trying to justify
what we've seen or will see. This makes perfect sense seeing how that’s what
she is, but this is annoying to the viewer who is not necessarily under theinfluence. Her preposterous first line sums up what I mean. She opens the movie
with “Just because I’m telling you this story doesn't mean I’m alive at the end
of it.” Trust me, when I heard this I couldn't possibly roll my eyes any
harder.
As far as the two leads they just don’t quite work. We meet
Chon first. He’s an ex-Navy SEAL. We’re fed some malarkey about how his time in
Iraq has scarred him but it really means nothing other than his solution to any
problem is shooting people and he has a bunch of other former SEALs available
to do his bidding whenever he needs them. He stands around with a stern look on
his face and disappears from the movie for stretches at a time.
The bigger problem is Ben. The first thing we notice is he
has the wrong name. With his white faux-Rastafarian look, smoking habits and
“We Are the World” exploits he should have the more hipster name, Chon. That
the guys’ names are misplaced is too clever by half. The important thing to
note is that they are opposites. O explains this in the first few minutes
after we meet Ben, and the movie as a whole makes the point repeatedly. His
peace-loving ways are supposed to inspire empathy. However, it has the reverse
effect. I spent most of the film wanting to punch him in face only to settle
for yelling at the screen for him to “man up and grow a pair”, calling him a
dirty word that begins with ‘p’ for emphasis. The script going overboard to make
us understand he’s a sensitive guy is partly to blame. Also at fault is the
performance of Aaron Taylor-Johnson. Half the time he sounds like he’s reading
his lines and the other half he’s whining. As a result he has little presence,
if any. Whoever he shares the screen with blows the poor guy away. This is a major issue considering we focus on his character more than any other.
Don’t go blaming the supporting cast for Taylor-Johnson’s
lack of pizzazz. They actually redeem the film. John Travolta is great as the
corrupt FBI agent in cahoots with our boys. He seems to be having big fun with
the role and lights up the screen whenever he’s on it which isn’t all that
often. Perhaps better than he, certainly with more screen time, is Salma Hayek.
She dominates her scenes aptly conveying not only an evil villain but a
compassionate mother. For my money, it’s among her best portrayals of her
English speaking roles. Better than them both is Benicio del Toro. A bad wig
(I’m assuming it’s a wig), 70s porn-stache, a too cool approach and oozing
confidence all help him make Lado a menacing figure. He’s the kind of guy that
unnerves less by the heinous acts he commits than the manner he goes about
them. If the others help the movie, he makes it.
Alas, no matter how good the supporting players are we have
to focus on the main characters and their story. This is where things fall
apart. As avant-garde as it wants you to think it is, it comes off as a bit
goofy and a lot sloppy. It’s also a bit disappointing it doesn't seem to want
to be anything other than an ultra-violent shoot ‘em up, given the director.
That’s probably a “me” problem. Since I knew going in it was an Oliver Stone
flick I was looking for some political and/or social statement that I didn't find. Enlighten me if I've missed it. That said, I didn't find
Savages to be a terrible film like most seem to have. I
found it fun, but very uneven.
MY SCORE: 6/10
Monday, November 14, 2011
Green Lantern
Directed by Martin Campbell.
2011. Rated PG-13, 114 minutes.Cast:
Ryan Reynolds
Blake Lively
Mark Strong
Peter Sarsgaard
Tim Robbins
Angela Bassett
Jay O. Sanders
Temuera Morrison
Clancy Brown
Michael Clarke Duncan
Abin Sur (Morrison) is the most celebrated member of the intergalactic police force known as The Green Lanterns. When he is fatally wounded by all-powerful villain Parallax (voiced by Clancy Brown) he manages to make it to the nearest inhabited planet before perishing. Of course, that planet is Earth. Once landing, Abin Sur commands his magical ring to go forth and choose his successor in the Green Lantern corps. It chooses loose cannon, ultra sarcastic playboy test pilot Hal Jordan (Reynolds).
Shortly, Hal is whisked away to the planet Oa (pronounced like Noah, but without the ‘n’). This is HQ for all the lanterns and he’s there to get some quick training. That means he gets an explanation on how the ring works and what it does. For the uninformed, the ring can instantly form anything he thinks of. It also allows him to fly and breathe in outer space. We’re never actually told this last bit, but roll with it. Hal doubts that he’s worthy, goes back home, saves a few lives and really gets thrust into the action when Parallax comes looking to make a snack out of Earth’s inhabitants. Meanwhile, Dr. Hector Hammond (Sarsgaard) suddenly develops telepathic and telekinetic powers and goes crazy after examining Abin Sur’s body. A piece of Parallax lodged in the dead alien’s chest infects the doc. In short, Dr. Hammond becomes the tune-up villain for our hero before the big smog (Parallax) comes to Earth.
Although it’s an origin story, Green Lantern is not one of those slow movers where we have to wait an hour before the action starts. It’s a fast-paced affair that gleefully zips along in a relentless attempt to make each action sequence a bigger spectacle than the last. It seems to be trying to make you say “Ooh, he just made a machine gun! There’s a giant racetrack! Ooh, the giant cloud of dust is zapping people!” And so on. By the way, I haven’t even mentioned the steadily increasing size of Dr. Hammond’s head.
For kids and others who just want to see lots of superhero stuff, this is a fun ride. “Stuff” happens all the time. For more discerning viewers, particularly overly critical fanboys, it will be a neon green tinted mess. Sure, lots of stuff keeps happening but much of it makes little or no sense. It feels like they just keep throwing things against the wall to see what sticks. Instead of developing the story, it rushes to the next action scene. This, combined with a tone that’s way too reminiscent of the Fantastic Four movies and a hero that acts more like Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark than the comic book version of Jordan gives the whole film a very cheesy feel. I’m not necessarily calling for “dark and gritty” like fanboys tend to do when criticizing the movies based on their favorite characters. However, if memory serves The Green Lantern comic books was more serious in approach. That helped offset some of the inherent silliness of a hero that forms a bunch of green things with his magic ring, has a serious problem with yellow and follows the command of a group of rather large-headed blue guys.
The silliness extends to our villain and the movie’s concept of the size of the galaxy. Creatures that can eliminate entire planets of people are difficult to translate to the screen. They gave a valiant effort but weren’t consistent with what Parallax could or couldn’t do. This is mostly a problem because he flat refuses a couple opportunities to kill our hero. Judging by the ending, our villain isn’t too bright, either. This little bit of ridiculousness involves the sun. I’ll just leave it at that. Still, in comparison to The Fantastic Four again, this movie does a better job with a similar bad guy. We get a far better representation of Parallax than the second FF flick has of Galactus. As far as the galaxy goes, I just find it funny that while no one beams anywhere like in Star Trek, anyone can get anywhere in a matter of minutes. It’s like Earth and Oa are next door neighbors.
MY SCORE: 5/10
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
The Town
Directed by Ben Affleck.
2010. Rated R, 125 minutes.
Cast:
Ben Affleck
Jeremy Renner
Rebecca Hall
Jon Hamm
Blake Lively
Peter Postlethwaite
Slaine
Titus Welliver
Doug MacRay (Affleck) and his boys rob a bank in their hometown of Charlestown, MA. As a warning, we’ve already been told this Boston-area city produces more bank and armored car robbers than anywhere in the world. Anyhoo, as things develop quickly, part of their getaway involves taking one of the bank’s managers hostage. Since they’re not completely evil and were wearing masks, they decide to let her out, blindfolded, at the beach. Our gang keeps her drivers license as a little insurance. When they finally bother to look at her license the next day, they discover she live right in their neighborhood. Doug takes it upon himself to follow her around and make sure she can’t give any useful information to the cops. Very unwisely, he starts courting the shaken would be witness and the two begin to fall madly in love.
These events set up an intriguing game of cat-and-mouse that is, at times, reminiscent of Michael Mann’s classic Heat. Don’t worry, this does plenty of its own thing and is outstanding in its own right. The storytelling is fascinating and the robbery scenes are intense. It also builds relationships that have grown from simple roots, but become more complicated as time goes on. The first is obviously of Doug and James (Renner), his partner-in-crime. Helping it be that is Renner as James. His and Affleck’s characters are like brothers, but actually aren’t. Each has selfish motives but needs the other. Like he was in The Hurt Locker, Renner is simply fantastic in his role.
Three other subplots are done just as well. There’s the cop procedural element. Here is where it most resembles Heat. The police learn who the bad guys are rather quickly. They just have to figure out how to catch them. Then, there is our gang’s working relationship with “The Florist” (Postletwaite). Finally, we have Doug’s relationship with his dad who’s been incarcerated for many years.
All of these things combine to make The Town a excellent experience. It is a crime drama through and through, a fantastic one at that. Kudos goes to Affleck, who steered the ship. With this, and Gone Baby Gone from a couple years ago, he’s establishing himself as an outstanding director.
MY SCORE: 8/10
Labels:
2010,
Ben Affleck,
Blake Lively,
Crime,
Drama,
Jeremy Renner,
Jon Hamm,
Rated R,
Rebecca Hall,
Reviews,
The Town
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)