Showing posts with label Tracie Thoms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tracie Thoms. Show all posts
Sunday, June 4, 2017
Friday, April 26, 2013
Looper
Directed by Rian Johnson.
2012. Rated R, 119 minutes.
Cast:
Piper Perabo
Noah Segan
Pierce Gagnon
Qing Xu
Our story focuses on Joe (Gordon-Levitt). He’s an assassin
known as a looper. His job is killing people sent back from the future by
mobsters who live in a time where disposing of bodies is virtually impossible.
At some point, whenever they decide they want to completely disassociate with a
particular looper, they “close his loop” by sending him his future self to gun
down. Needless to say, when Joe fails to kill the older Joe (Willis) who has
been zapped back to him, all sorts of problems arise. Young Joe trying to kill
his loop, Joe’s boss (Daniels), plus a slew of henchmen, trying to kill Joe
and/or his loop and his loop doing some killing of his own ensues.
Despite the focus on shooting people,
Looper is a thinking man’s action flick. It disguises that
fact pretty well until it’s final moments. Until then it plays out like a
wonderful game of cat and mouse and mouse (not a typo). As you might imagine,
such a scenario makes it difficult for us to figure out who to root for. This
is a good thing. Both the younger and older Joe have compelling reasons for
their actions. Since they’re not presented simultaneously our allegiances sway.
Eventually, we meet Sara (Blunt) and her little boy Cid
(Gagnon). They figure heavily in the proceedings, but we’re not sure what to
make of them, either. Again, this is good. It’s good because we’re never
confused, just conflicted. Our confliction adds to the tension between chase
scenes and shootouts. We find ourselves on the edge of our seats as pending
danger for one person or another creeps closer. The trick is, through more
character development that we had any right to expect from a shoot 'em up sci-fi
flick, we become vested in these people. We really understand why each of them feel
their actions are the only way to deal with the issues at hand. This is used to
much greater effect than rushing us off to the next action sequence, or trying
to dazzle us with special fx. Even though, like I said, at it’s core it is
science-fiction, Looper is not about showing off whatever
futuristic gadgets the filmmakers can dream up or giving us a laser and lights
show. It’s a rather human tale that happens to contain time-travel.
Humanity not only drives the movie, but ends it as well. One
character makes a decision many of us would like to believe we’d make but I’m
not sure how many really would. Once it happens, Looper
instantly becomes a parable addressing several issues pertaining to current-day
society. I choose the word parable because it is not terribly different from
some religious stories. Still, that’s not why it has the immediate impact it
does. It has that because it poses a simple question you can debate with your
friends. Would you do it?
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Safe House
Directed by Daniel Espinosa.
2012. Rated R, 115 minutes.
Cast:
Brendan Gleeson
Fares Fares
Liam Cunningham
Nora Arnezeder
Rubén Blades
Sam Shepard
Robert Patrick
Joel Kinnaman
Tracie Thoms
Since he is an FBI agent you wouldn’t think Matt Weston
(Reynolds) has a boring job, but he does. He spends all day, every day as a
housekeeper. No, he’s not the kind you rich folks employ. He is the sole agent
posted at a “safe house,” a temporary holding facility for bad guys collared by
the agency. This one is in Cape Town, South Africa. There is rarely anyone to
watch. Suddenly, there is when former agent and suspected traitor Tobin Frost
(Washington) turns himself in after a rather tense set of events has him
staring death in the face. He’s brought to the safe house by a whole team of
agents. Of course, things don’t go so smoothly. Some very bad people are after
Mr. Frost and shoot their way in. After a narrow escape, Matt must not only
stay alive but somehow get Frost safely to the higher-ups. His task is made
even more difficult by the fact that Frost doesn’t really want to be in
custody. The two men playing cat and mouse with both the bad guys and each
other ensues.
Speedy pacing is this movie’s best friend. Though it doesn’t
really break any new ground in the action/espionage genre, it does keep its
foot fastened to the gas pedal. The next action sequence is never far off. For
the most part, they don’t disappoint. They’re tense and just enough over the
top to remain exciting. They’re helped by a narrative that functions enough to
keep us somewhat interested in the fates of these two guys. Many of the twists
and turns we can see coming pretty far off. However, in this instance they’re
still pulled off nicely. So while it is predictable, it still works.
Lots of credit for clichés working well is due to our leads. Denzel does the thing where he’s constantly trying to pull jedi mind tricks on the other guy. Pure Denzel. Like Pacino, Nicholson and De Niro, he’s in that rarified air where he’s always enjoyable even though he’s basically playing the same character he always does, just with different occupations.
By contrast, Denzel’s co-star Ryan Reynolds mostly forgoes
his usual wiseass routine, giving us more of a straight-laced action hero. Even
without his normal one-liners, the banter between he and Denzel is fun and he
becomes easy to root for. For me, it’s his best performance in a non-comedy
except possibly the underrated remake of The Amityville
Horror. Yeah, I’m the one person that likes that movie.
If you’re just looking for an action flick to pass time, you
could certainly do worse than Safe House. Despite the fact
it offer little or nothing in the way of originality, it’s still an enjoyable
ride. It gives us what we came for the way we like. Is it a masterpiece? No.
However, for a popcorn flick it works fine. It goes down smoothly. Perhaps it’s
a tad too smooth as there are no real surprises, but smooth nonetheless.
MY SCORE: 6.5/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




