Showing posts with label Rosamund Pike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosamund Pike. Show all posts
Monday, January 5, 2015
Thursday, March 20, 2014
The World's End
Directed by Edgar Wright.
2013. Rated R, 109 minutes.
Cast:
Michael Smiley
David Bradley
Sophie Evans
In the twenty-plus years since college, Gary King (Pegg) has had a rough go
of it. We meet him while he's in rehab, recounting the best night of his life.
It was near the end of this senior year when he and his chums tried to complete
the "Golden Mile." This includes drinking at least one pint of beer
at each of the twelve pubs stretched over a few blocks in their hometown of
Newton Haven. They didn't quite make it, but it was still an epic night. Realizing
that even his very best night was one of unfulfilled potential he decides to
give it another try. He recruits his old buddies, all of whom reluctantly agree
despite the fact they've moved on from such antics. Except for repeatedly
butting heads with Andy (Frost), his former sidekick, things start off
reasonably well. This changes a few pubs in when the gang discovers there is
something very strange about the people in their old stomping grounds. It seems
much of the population has been replaced by robots. Our heroes trying to
survive the night, figure out who is responsible and why, and still complete
the "Golden Mile" ensues.
Early on, the movie is just a tad flat. Our hero attempting to convince his
buddies to come along and then arguing over the past is okay, but nothing
special. It's done to establish the characters, which is fine. It just isn't as
funny as one might expect given the track record of the people involved. There
are the usual sly references to other films, some overt ones, a healthy dose of
sarcasm and smarter-than-you-think jokes. The main issue is we find ourselves
waiting on something, anything to happen. Thankfully, just as we're getting
restless, something does. The robots show up and the movie shifts into high
gear.
With the switch in gears comes a genre change, too. We go from a straight
comedy to one that inclues action and sci-fi. The fun factor increases
exponentially and the things we did like from earlier in the movie remain. The
jokes come a little quicker and the time between them is filled with a much
more kinetic energy. Beneath it all, the relationship between Gary and Andy
barrels toward a head. Something has to give. As much as dealing with the
robots, getting us to brace ourselves for the inevitable moment of truth the
two must share propels the movie.
Through all of the goings on, we get a surprisingly intense examination of
Gary. He appears to be an acute sufferer of Peter Pan Syndrome. He doesn't
wanna grow up. His reasoning is stated plainly early on, but over time we are
made aware how deep his scars run. Honestly, much of it is his own doing. This
makes him a pathetic figure, though not entirely sympathetic. He's just another
big man on campus who drowned when he found himself in deeper waters. Instead
of swimming, he chose to sink. We don't necessarily dislike Gary, but our heart
belongs more to Andy. Andy is the one who thinks most clearly of the bunch, and
stands up to Gary. Most importantly, he has his act together.
I understand depth is not the reason we watch comedies. It's nice that it's
there, but we want to laugh. Watching this, we do. How much depends on a few
factors. One is how you feel about a style of humor often, but not always, more
subtle than much of what passes for comedy these days. For instance, a rather
clever running gag involves the etymology of the word 'robot.' Another factor
might be whether or not you've seen Shaun of the Dead.
The World's End covers a lot of the same territory. At
times, it feels like we just swapped out zombies for 'bots. So while it's a fun
and funny movie, even a notch above most recent comedies, it doesn't quite
achieve greatness.
MY SCORE: 7.5/10
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Jack Reacher
Directed
by Christopher McQuarrie.
2012.
Rated PG-13, 130 minutes.
Cast:
Werner Herzog
Alexia Fast
Josh Helman
Dylan Kussman
Joseph Sikora
Our movie begins
with a seemingly random shooting spree. From a parking deck across the street,
sniper James Barr (Sikora) picks off five people, gets back into his van and
speeds away. Through some crack police work, Det. Emerson (Oyelowo) figures out
who the bad guy is, takes the SWAT team over to the guy’s house and arrests
him. While awaiting trial in prison, some fellow inmates lay a beat-down on
Barr. Before falling into a coma, he requests that Emerson, and District
Attorney Rodin (Jenkins) get Jack Reacher (Cruise). They have no idea how to
get a hold of Mr. Reacher since he’s been missing for the last few years.
Luckily for them, Reacher catches wind of the shooting on the news and just
strolls into the police station on his own. In a strange move for both parties
considering Reacher’s feelings on the matter, he winds up working for Helen (Pike),
Barr’s defense attorney, who also happens to be the daughter of the DA. Reacher
investigating the crime ensues.
If you’re a Tom
Cruise hater, there is no reason for you to watch this movie or read beyond
this point. You've already decided not to see this movie. And yes, he more or
less plays Tom Cruise. This character feels no different than Ethan Hawke from
the Mission: Impossible flicks, or from his character in
Knight and Day, or any number of films where he’s tasked
with saving the day. On the other hand, if the mere mention of his name does
not make you physically ill, then stick it out. By this point, he seems to have
become a one trick pony. Thankfully, it is not a terrible trick.
Fortunately, our
supporting cast is solid. Pike does fine work as Barr’s lawyer. She’s delightfully
defiant in her willingness to defend an apparently guilty man. The drawback is
that her chemistry with Cruise is a bit off. This is, at least partly, due to
the script. It can’t figure out if it wants there to be sexual tension between
them or not. Things initially head down that path, but the trip is abandoned.
Richard Jenkins is great, as always, albeit in brief bursts of screen time.
During the movie’s latter parts it is completely stolen by Robert Duvall and,
surprisingly, famed director Werner Herzog. The two find themselves on opposing
sides, but neither is any less enjoyable than the other. We just enjoy them
differently. Duvall brings us comic relief while Herzog creeps us out.
Since we follow
him around much of the time, we must get back to our hero. Reacher goes all
over town chasing down leads and, as expected, this gets him into the
occasional scrape. We focus more on the following of the clues than the
violence. The movie is successful with this as what’s going on becomes
increasingly interesting. There are just enough twists within the narrative to
keep us paying attention to what’s between action scenes. This is very
important because there really is not that much action. That fact, plus our
expectations, for those of us who have seen the trailer, help create an
identity crisis for our feature. It never seems sure if it’s a procedural or an
action flick. As the former, things tend to come a little too easily for our
hero. As the latter, as I've mentioned, there’s not quite enough of it. Of course,
our finale is one where bullets and fists fly. While that’s not terribly
original, it is entertaining. For some, however, it may be too little too late.
Overall,
Jack Reacher is a fun movie. It’s a popcorn flick with
ever-so-slightly more on its mind than the usual. We get an intriguing tale
with some enjoyable performances. It’s not a bad way to pass two hours. That
said, you must understand that if you’re looking for a non-stop action shoot ‘em
up, this is not it.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Wrath of the Titans
Directed by Jonathan Liebesman.
2012. Rated PG-13, 99 minutes.
Cast:
Édgar Ramirez
Danny Huston
Lily James
John Bell
Kathryn Carpenter
Even though he’s half-god, Perseus (Worthington) has made it clear to his father Zeus (Neeson) he wants nothing to do with those snobs on Mount Olympus. Still, the old man comes sniveling back, begging Perseus to save their hides. Zeus’ dad Kronos is a little ornery over being defeated by his boys eons earlier and wants a return match. After Kronos starts killing off gods and threatens both the gods and man alike, you know who reluctantly joins the fray. He enlists the help of Queen Andromeda (Pike), her army and his cousin, fellow half-god Agenor (Kebbell). In case you’re somehow not sure, this is the sequel to the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans.
That last sentence sums up a lot of what people think is wrong with Hollywood. It’s what they point to as evidence of the movie industry’s lack of original though. This is particularly true of the blockbusters flooding the multiplexes every summer; an endless procession of sequels, prequels, remakes, reboots and re-imaginings heavy on techno wizardry and light on substance. These generalizations might seem unfair in a review on any one film in particular. However, Wrath of the Titans must wear the shoe it fits.
Sam Worthington adds another to his repertoire of bland protagonists. Liam Neeson does what Liam Neeson does: use his booming voice to give his character an air of authority. However, he spends most of the movie on the sidelines. Pike just looks pretty as Queen Andromeda. Most bizarrely, Kebbell as Agenor seems to be impersonating Russell Brand. As simple as the plot seems, its execution is jumbled. It doesn't always make sense and a general mess is made of Greek mythology. In short, stuff just keeps happening whether it’s logical or not.
On the plus side, that stuff keeps the movie somewhat interesting. There is tons of action as our heroes try to save both the Earth and the heavens. Creature designs are generally fantastic and they tear up things pretty well. The one exception being our main baddy. He’s a little too out of whack with everything else and getting anywhere near him should cause death. Sadly, it doesn't because then our hero wouldn't be able to be heroic. There is some heavy-handedness about father-son and sibling relationships. Honestly, this doesn't bother me since it at least makes sense. More troublesome is the weirdly atheist undertones. As I've said in reviews of other films there are good, even excellent movies from that point of view. The problem here is it feels needlessly subversive to its own subject matter. Combined with all the poetic license taken with the characters we get the feeling the people who made Wrath of the Titans don’t exactly appreciate Greek mythology.
Much like its predecessor, Wrath isn't the worst movie in the world. It’s just not a good one, either. The visuals work very well. Full disclosure: I did not watch either of the franchise’s movies in 3D which I’ve heard complaints about, especially in regards to the first film. The action keeps things moving along nicely and it’s thankfully short at ninety-nine minutes. Unfortunately, the characters are dull and/or given nothing to do and what’s happening around them doesn't always add up.
MY SCORE: 5/10
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)