Showing posts with label David Harbour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Harbour. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 24, 2021
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Monday, September 29, 2014
The Equalizer
Directed by Antoine Fuqua.
2014. Rated R, 131 minutes.
Cast:
Denzel Washington
Marton Csokas
Chloe Grace Moretz
David Harbour
Johnny Skourtis
Melissa Leo
Bill Pullman
Haley Bennett
Alex Veadov
Vladimir Kulich
At Home Depot...er...HomeMart, where he works, Rober McCall (Washington) is the star employee. His bosses and co-workers all look up to him and he'll do anything he can to help out each and every one of them. He is also a man deeply mired in the routines of his life. He has to have everything a certain way. A bit of an insomniac, he finds himself at the local diner at 2 AM every morning. He sits in the same booth, sets up his silverware the way he likes and gets a cup of hot water for the tea bag that he brings from home. He also talks to Elaina (Moretz), the young girl who is always seated at the counter. She also happens to be a hooker. The night she's not there, Robert becomes very worried. When he finds out she's in the hospital after being badly beaten by her pimp, he takes matters into his own hands.
The early parts of the movie are spent developing Mr. McCall's character. We get to see what makes him tick. During this time, Denzel Washington owns the screen, completely selling us on what type of guy McCall is. The first few scenes establish him as definitely having Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. However, it's subsequent scenes during which the point is driven home. It's not necessarily in the acting out of the routines, but in his subtle reactions when those routines are broken. More importantly, we come to realize how much he cares for those around him. This is most ably demonstrated through his conversations with Elaina and his interactions with Ralphie (Skourtis), one of his co-workers down at HomeMart. Washington's supporting cast helps him out just enough, too. Marton Csokas gives us a solidly detestable villain. In her brief screen time, Chloe Grace Moretz also does very well.
For those of us old enough to remember, and to care, the big question is how does it compare to the TV show that it was based on. I am old enough to remember. However, I must confess that I was never a fan of the show. I might have watched it a handful of times and really don't remember anything about it other than the star. This means that, sadly, I've no clue whether or not it does the show proud. I do know that it does the action genre proud. Once it gets going The Equalizer is insanely fun, provided you're not put off by all the blood and guts. The first act perfectly sets up the last two acts. It's a guy we like doing things we wish we could do for the people we care about. Admittedly, there are some late second act scenes that fill in some of our hero's back story, though not very much. The real point of these is to provide something that could be expanded on in sequels. Trust me, this movie clearly wants sequels. To be honest, though, it might be better as a standalone. In either case, it's Denzel showing us all that he can still carry a movie without a big name co-star and still be extremely compelling. That quality is what really makes this an excellent watch.
Monday, November 4, 2013
Snitch
Directed by Ric Roman Waugh.
2013. Rated PG-13, 112 minutes.
Cast
Jon Bernthal
Michael K. Williams
Melina Kanakaredes
Nadine Velazquez
Rafi Gavron
You just can’t trust people these days. Jason (Gavron)
learns the hard way when his best friend sets him up with the feds by shipping
a box of illegal pills to his house. The thing is, Jason is not really in the
drug game. His buddy is and just needed someone to implicate in order to reduce
his own sentence. Now, he faces a possible ten year prison bid. No worries, his
dad happens to be The Rock…er…Dwayne Johnson…I mean John, played by The
Rock…um…Dwayne Johnson. Like any good parent, dad wants
to help his son in any way possible. Since we need something to justify us
spending nearly two hours with him on his quest to save the boy from permanently
becoming Bubba’s bitch, he does so in the dumbest way he can imagine. Despite being wealthy enough to afford a lawyer good enough to beat an extremely flimsy
case, he uses his connections to get a meeting with Joanne Keeghan (Sarandon),
the powerful District Prosecutor. There, he volunteers to do what his son
wouldn't: help the cops catch more bad guys. Despite being told it doesn't work
that way, and warned not to do anything stupid, he does precisely that. He
takes it upon himself to go undercover and pretend to be a guy looking to get
into the drug trafficking business.
The setup of any movie requires the viewer to buy in for our
suspension of disbelief to kick in. This is no different. The problem is in
trying to simultaneously create empathy for John it removes logic from his
thought process. What he does should be a last ditch effort, not the first
thing that pops into his brains. As mentioned, he’s financially well off. He
owns a successful business. It is obvious he is not an idiot. I’m sure the man
has dealt with lawyers before. Why he immediately accepts what he’s been told
at the police station and by the prosecutor who’s job it is to lock people up
boggles the mind. He never even asks his son what happened. It becomes galling
because we know that the case against the kid is flimsy. Yes, the feds have a
bunch of pills that were shipped to the boy. However, their whole case is really
based on the idea Jason explicitly agreed to commit the crime he’s charged
with. What makes this flimsy is not just that he did no such thing, but the
entire conversation takes place online, so it’s presumably retrievable. Any
lawyer worth his salt would have a field day with this. The takeaway from all
this is that our hero is a guy unnecessarily playing cowboy. It’s something he does
several times throughout the picture, putting himself and the rest of his
family in harm’s way. The movie would have benefited greatly from having
everything he does be the only thing he can. It rarely feels this way. Instead
it feels like we’re watching a man back himself into a corner over and over
again when he doesn't have to.
Faulty premise aside, Snitch does a
number of things well. For starters, and in aid of its “inspired by true
events” label, it resists the urge to become an all out balls-to-the-wall
action flick until very late in the movie. It lets situations play out in a
manner that at least suggests reality more than simply having John load up his
arsenal and go hunting bad guys. We get a decent bit of tension from wondering
how our hero will come out of his various predicaments in possession of his
life. Two people in particular help things along in this regard. First, Barry
Pepper as Agent Cooper excellently provides our voice of reason. He gets roped
in to working with John, but doesn't like it one bit. He knows the risks too
well. His heedings are at the backs of our minds whenever … decides to fly by
the seat of his pants, which is often. On the other end of the spectrum is
Michael K. Williams as mid-level drug dealer Malik. I know, it’s a
stereotypical role. However, he plays it with such intensity we can’t help
feeling a little worried for anyone on the screen with him.
The pacing of the film also works to its advantage. It moves
along nicely, quickly getting our hero into one dangerous scenario after another.
Between them, he argues with Susan Sarandon. The cycle works well enough that
eventually, we let go of that nonsensical beginning and just roll with the idea
that this is a father trying to save his son. Still, the memory of it is never
completely erased because our hero keeps doing stupid things. This is just one
way in which the movie undermines itself. Another is in its heavy-handedness. I
mentioned the pacing is a plus. However, we get numerous pauses in the movie’s
flow so someone to make sure the audience understands that none of this would
have happened if not for the evils of mandatory sentencing. Whether I agree or
not is irrelevant. I don’t want to be repeatedly hammered over the head with
any viewpoint. At times, it feels more like propaganda than entertainment. A
message should be weaved seamlessly into the narrative, not stopping it in its
tracks every so often. The end result is a movie that works when it focuses on
dad saving the day, but struggles with everything else.
MY SCORE: 6/10
Friday, June 14, 2013
End of Watch
Directed by David Ayer.
2012. Rated R, 109 minutes.
Cast:
Natalie Martinez
Jaime FitzSimons
Brian (Gyllenhaal) and Mike (Peña) are partners in the LAPD.
Together, they patrol some of the meanest streets in Los Angeles. Having spent
countless hours in a squad car discussing anything and everything, they've
grown to form a brotherly bond. Brian is a bachelor who studies law and shoots
video of everything. We view most of the film through his lens. Mike is married
with a baby on the way. We follow the dynamic duo as they serve and protect.
Eventually, some overzealous tactics find them interfering with the business of
a Mexican Cartel operating in the City of Angels. Hazards of the job ensue.
The main strength of End of Watch is
that we come to know these officers as well as they know one another. We’re
privy to some intimate conversations that inform us how each guy thinks. We
appreciate them for who they are and can understand the choices they make, even
if we don’t always agree. Both Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Peña help the
process along with completely natural performances. We really feel as if we’re
riding along with two cops on their day-to-day grind, passing downtime with both
profundity and profanity. When off-duty, we even get to know their significant
others: Mike’s wife Gabby (Martinez) and Brian’s girlfriend Janet (Kendrick). Even
the other cops fit nicely into the story. Among these supporting players, look
for America Ferrera who is very effective playing a role way off-type for her.
It all helps create a well-rounded portrait of the two men at the eye of this
particular storm.
Of course, watching a couple cops drive around in their
squad car is only half the story. The more viscerally thrilling part is what
happens when they’re actively fighting crime. These guys manage to stumble upon
some really wild and gruesome scenarios. Some of them are more dangerous than
others, a few of them heartbreaking, all of them heart-pounding. Though it all
works itself into a coherent narrative, the plot doesn't dominate every waking
moment as it would in most movies. It’s something that develops on the very
edges of the peripheral awareness of our heroes. What they do know they don’t
even take that seriously. This gives the story a more organic feel.
Unfortunately, some well-worn Hollywood tropes figure into
our finale. While it is effective at making us sad, it’s still predictable. While
I don’t find it to be quite racist, I might not argue with anyone who thinks
otherwise. Point being, cinematic history certainly has its favorites which
this movie doesn't deviate from. That said, the film creates a dilemma for
itself. A slightly darker ending would likely be too cynical, a lighter one too
easy. An inversion of what happens might be the braver conclusion, but less
commercially viable. None of this is to say End of Watch
is ruined by its climax. We’re still emotionally taxed by the last few frames.
We've still had an enjoyable, if torturous, experience.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Revolutionary Road
Directed by Sam Mendes.
2008. Rated R, 118 minutes.
Cast:
Kate Winslet
Leonardo DiCaprio
Kathy Bates
Michael Shannon
David Harbour
Dylan Baker
Richard Easton
Zoe Kazan
Plot: Frank (Di Caprio) and April Wheeler (Winslet) are an unhappy couple. They suddenly decide and start planning a move to Paris in hopes of chasing their dreams and rekindling the flames of their marriage.
The Good: First and foremost, both Winslet and Di Caprio turn in powerhouse performances. They are two of the very best in the business and they do not disappoint, here. To support them, director Sam Mendes surrounds them with an excellent cast and does a masterful job telling the story. The standout among the supporting players is Michael Shannon as the supposedly mentally ill John. I say supposedly because he seems less crazy than he does simply lacking a filter between his brain and mouth. As far as telling the story, Mendes carefully weaves a tapestry of issues until they seem almost singular and explode simultaneously.
The Bad: The focus on our main couple is so strict, other potentially interesting elements are brushed aside. In particular, the Wheeler’s neighbors are profoundly affected by what’s going on. However, given a certain event there could be much more shown. They certainly could’ve had some explosive moments of their own. Also, the Wheeler children are conveniently ushered off stage and easily spared the drama. It feels as if they’re not at all aware of what’s going on in their home, much less bothered by it. As a father, I can tell you it’s just too tidy an area of such a messy relationship.
The Ugly: The reason there is blood on the carpet.
Recommendation: This is a tough drama with three brilliant performances. It not only depicts a crumbling marriage, it raises questions. Though it clearly comes out on one side over the other, the pro-life/pro-choice debate eventually comes to fuel the movie and leaves us something to chew on.
The Opposite View: Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com
What the Internet Says: 7.6/10 on imdb.com (5/23/10), 68% on rottentomatoes.com, 69/100 on metacritic.com
MY SCORE: 8/10
2008. Rated R, 118 minutes.
Cast:
Kate Winslet
Leonardo DiCaprio
Kathy Bates
Michael Shannon
David Harbour
Dylan Baker
Richard Easton
Zoe Kazan
Plot: Frank (Di Caprio) and April Wheeler (Winslet) are an unhappy couple. They suddenly decide and start planning a move to Paris in hopes of chasing their dreams and rekindling the flames of their marriage.
The Good: First and foremost, both Winslet and Di Caprio turn in powerhouse performances. They are two of the very best in the business and they do not disappoint, here. To support them, director Sam Mendes surrounds them with an excellent cast and does a masterful job telling the story. The standout among the supporting players is Michael Shannon as the supposedly mentally ill John. I say supposedly because he seems less crazy than he does simply lacking a filter between his brain and mouth. As far as telling the story, Mendes carefully weaves a tapestry of issues until they seem almost singular and explode simultaneously.
The Bad: The focus on our main couple is so strict, other potentially interesting elements are brushed aside. In particular, the Wheeler’s neighbors are profoundly affected by what’s going on. However, given a certain event there could be much more shown. They certainly could’ve had some explosive moments of their own. Also, the Wheeler children are conveniently ushered off stage and easily spared the drama. It feels as if they’re not at all aware of what’s going on in their home, much less bothered by it. As a father, I can tell you it’s just too tidy an area of such a messy relationship.
The Ugly: The reason there is blood on the carpet.
Recommendation: This is a tough drama with three brilliant performances. It not only depicts a crumbling marriage, it raises questions. Though it clearly comes out on one side over the other, the pro-life/pro-choice debate eventually comes to fuel the movie and leaves us something to chew on.
The Opposite View: Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com
What the Internet Says: 7.6/10 on imdb.com (5/23/10), 68% on rottentomatoes.com, 69/100 on metacritic.com
MY SCORE: 8/10
Monday, April 13, 2009
Quantum of Solace
Quantum of Solace
2008. Rated PG-13.
Director: Marc Forster. Starring Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Olga Kurylenko, Mathieu Amalric, Giancarlo Giannini, Gemma Arterton, Jeffrey Wright, David Harbour.
Plot: An attempt on M's (Dench) life by the mysterious Quantum organization leads Bond (Craig) to Haiti where he meets the beautiful Camille (Kurylenko). She in turn, leads him to Quantum's leader Dominic Greene who is of course, trying to take over the world in some form or fashion. Action ensues. Or re-ensues, since it starts with a car chase, but nevermind.
The Good: The action, duh! These sequences will flat knock you on your butt. It amplifies the Bourne-style in splendidly brutal fight and chase scenes with amazing stunts. However, it's careful to never get into the gizmo heavy cheesefests that marred the Pierce Brosnan 007 flicks. This Bond also has another thing in common with Bourne, he's ruthless, in fact moreso. He's piling up quite a body count. To pull this off, Daniel Craig is perfect. Whether or not he's the best Bond is a matter of opinion. What isn't open to debate is the fact that he's given us by far the most athletic version of the character. Aside from the physical stuff, we also notice that for the first time, a Bond movie isn't a stand-alone adventure. It's actually a real sequel that often refers to it's predecessor. This further humanizes our hero, even as he's performing unbelievable feats. He often has thoughts of revenge and can't sleep due to the events of the prior movie. The relationship between Bond and M continues as it did in Casino Royale as well. That is, it provides a solid foundation and seems to grow during the movie. It helps that Judi Dench has been wonderful in the role.
The Bad: The story is convoluted and rushed. This seems to be a constant Bond problem as the bad guy has to go through a whole lot to take over the world and Bond has to go all over the world, quite literally, to figure things out. As a result, he seems to discover a lot of things either by accident or unintentionally implied psychic ability and we are left scrambling to catch up. The movie is also formulaic. In CR, there were long sections of the movie devoted to us getting to know the new Bond. Here, those sections are stripped away and we just follow the same leftover steps. As far as Bond villains go, Dominic Greene and the evil general we meet later are a bit bland. If the Bond reboot needs anything, it's "a better brand of criminal" to quote The Joker. Oh, and what happened to the creative names for the bad guys and the Bond girls. Hearing the outlandish and sometimes racy names of these characters was part of the fun. I realize they wanted to get away from some of the more silly aspects of the franchise but they could lighten up just a tad. Dominic Greene and Camille? Where's the fun in that?
The Ugly: He keeps tearing up my Aston Martins!
Recommendation: As with any of the Bond movies over the course of 40 years, it's a must-see for fans. It's also a must-see for action fans since it may be the genre's best film of 2008 that doesn't include a costumed hero (unless you consider a well-tailored suit a costume). It's also not as good as CR. While, it's certainly a fun ride, the movie between the action scenes is lacking. Fortunately, those action scenes come early and often and are all dynamite.
The Opposite View: Mike McGranaghan, Aisle Seat
What the Internet Says: 7.0/10 on imdb.com (4/6/09), 65% on rottentomatoes.com, 58/100 on metacritic.com
2008. Rated PG-13.
Director: Marc Forster. Starring Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Olga Kurylenko, Mathieu Amalric, Giancarlo Giannini, Gemma Arterton, Jeffrey Wright, David Harbour.
Plot: An attempt on M's (Dench) life by the mysterious Quantum organization leads Bond (Craig) to Haiti where he meets the beautiful Camille (Kurylenko). She in turn, leads him to Quantum's leader Dominic Greene who is of course, trying to take over the world in some form or fashion. Action ensues. Or re-ensues, since it starts with a car chase, but nevermind.
The Good: The action, duh! These sequences will flat knock you on your butt. It amplifies the Bourne-style in splendidly brutal fight and chase scenes with amazing stunts. However, it's careful to never get into the gizmo heavy cheesefests that marred the Pierce Brosnan 007 flicks. This Bond also has another thing in common with Bourne, he's ruthless, in fact moreso. He's piling up quite a body count. To pull this off, Daniel Craig is perfect. Whether or not he's the best Bond is a matter of opinion. What isn't open to debate is the fact that he's given us by far the most athletic version of the character. Aside from the physical stuff, we also notice that for the first time, a Bond movie isn't a stand-alone adventure. It's actually a real sequel that often refers to it's predecessor. This further humanizes our hero, even as he's performing unbelievable feats. He often has thoughts of revenge and can't sleep due to the events of the prior movie. The relationship between Bond and M continues as it did in Casino Royale as well. That is, it provides a solid foundation and seems to grow during the movie. It helps that Judi Dench has been wonderful in the role.
The Bad: The story is convoluted and rushed. This seems to be a constant Bond problem as the bad guy has to go through a whole lot to take over the world and Bond has to go all over the world, quite literally, to figure things out. As a result, he seems to discover a lot of things either by accident or unintentionally implied psychic ability and we are left scrambling to catch up. The movie is also formulaic. In CR, there were long sections of the movie devoted to us getting to know the new Bond. Here, those sections are stripped away and we just follow the same leftover steps. As far as Bond villains go, Dominic Greene and the evil general we meet later are a bit bland. If the Bond reboot needs anything, it's "a better brand of criminal" to quote The Joker. Oh, and what happened to the creative names for the bad guys and the Bond girls. Hearing the outlandish and sometimes racy names of these characters was part of the fun. I realize they wanted to get away from some of the more silly aspects of the franchise but they could lighten up just a tad. Dominic Greene and Camille? Where's the fun in that?
The Ugly: He keeps tearing up my Aston Martins!
Recommendation: As with any of the Bond movies over the course of 40 years, it's a must-see for fans. It's also a must-see for action fans since it may be the genre's best film of 2008 that doesn't include a costumed hero (unless you consider a well-tailored suit a costume). It's also not as good as CR. While, it's certainly a fun ride, the movie between the action scenes is lacking. Fortunately, those action scenes come early and often and are all dynamite.
The Opposite View: Mike McGranaghan, Aisle Seat
What the Internet Says: 7.0/10 on imdb.com (4/6/09), 65% on rottentomatoes.com, 58/100 on metacritic.com
MY SCORE: 6/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)