Sunday, November 30, 2014

NOOOOvember: Godzilla

Originally posted 11/28/14 on Silver Screen Serenade - NOOOOvember: Dell on Movies.



Caragale at Silver Screen Serenade is running a blogathon of her very own, the NOOOOvember 2014 Blogathon. The object of this is for us bloggers to vent about movies we had high expectations for, but were let down. Hard.

Man, do I have lots of those.

The one I'm going with for this exercise is a movie I watched just recently after I knew that most of you were gushing over it, proclaiming it a triumphant return for a certain iconic movie creature. Let's see, there were the critics lauding it with a 78% score on rottentomatoes.com and an average score of 73/100 on metacritic. Then there was you, the audience. You blessed it with a global take of $525 million at the box office. Cool. Memories of 1998's fiasco seemed to be erased. I gladly sat down to take in the new and improved Godzilla.

Sigh.

Back in 1999, we meet Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston) and his wife Sandra (Juliette Binoche). They are both scientist working in Japan at a place where lots of sciency stuff happens. It comes to Joe's attention that some sort of seismic event is taking place. Whatever it is, it's highly radioactive and destroys their place of employment, killing Sandra in the process. Fast-forward to the present. Joe is still in Japan, frantically trying to figure out what happened all those years ago. Meanwhile, his little boy Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is now all grown up, in the military, and has a family of his own. He also wants nothing to do with Dad, whom he thinks has gone cuckoo for Coco Puffs. More seismic, radioactive stuff. If we hadn't guessed, we find out for sure that it something to do with a gigantic monster going all bull in a china shop with man-made structures all around the globe. No, not the one in the title. This is the bad monster. Eventually, Godzilla shows up to be the good monster. Not nearly enough stuff ensues over two hours of my life that I demand be returned to me.

Wait, what? I didn't like yet another American attempt at the most iconic monster in movie history? I mean, there's the possible exception of King Kong, but you get the point. And I consider myself blessed to be an American, so don't even go there with me. Why did I not love this? To steal from the great Elizabeth Barrett Browning, let me count the ways.

My biggest gripe is that I actually want some Godzilla in my Godzilla movies. It's nearly an hour before the big guy (or gal, ask Matthew Broderick) shows up. Granted, when he does he gets one of those great slow-motion, from the bottom up reveals that shows off the magnificence of this particular piece of cgi. We get roughly half-a-dozen repeats of this over the next forty minutes. Thankfully, there are some variations in the angles of these shots, but they're still just more slow-motion looks at the titular monster doing nothing. Sadly, that's all we get. This means that for almost two hours, the monster portion of the movie consists of quick scenes of the bad monster moving from place to place every twenty minutes or so (didn't actually time it, just guessing) and shots of surface water moving along as Godzilla presumably travels beneath it. Eventually, a second bad monster shows up. I won't spoil what happens with that, in case you somehow don't trust my word over everyone else's and see this anyway. It's okay, really. Just know that I rolled my eyes as hard as possible and felt like it was 1998 all over again.


You know what the most frustrating part of this whole experience was? There are several occasions where things are finally about to pop off only for the alleged film-makers to pull the rug out from under us. A few times, Godzilla actually engages the other monsters for some rough and tumble only for the camera to cut away just as they start getting down to business. One time, we're stuck with the point-of-view of our human characters who scurry inside and shut the door. No windows. Yup, I can plainly see Godzilla and one of the bad monsters commence to whipping each other's asses only to then see a door shutting in my face. And I can't push the damn thing open. Really? WTF!

WHAT THE FUUUUUGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!

Damn humans.

Speaking of humans, and I consider myself blessed to be human so don't go there with me, let's talk about them. They are the other reason why this is a rotten movie. for some strange reason, a bunch of people got together and decided they weren't going to make a dumb action flick where monsters fight and smash things all the time. Of course, the problem is that's EXACTLY what they should have made. Instead, we try to turn a "movie" featuring giant monsters into a compelling "film" about human relationships. Yeah, well, it sucks at that. We mostly pal around with Aaron Taylor-Johnson, our blank slate of a lead actor. At first, he and dad sneak around trying to figure out what's going on. These scenes are at least somewhat fun because the always fun Bryan Cranston carries them. He brings much needed depth and even zaniness to the proceedings. Unfortunately he soon, and predictably, disappears from the action.

Similarly misused are two other great actors: Ken Watanabe and Elizabeth Olsen. Watanabe pops up from time to time to give us history on Godzilla and other exposition in a grim and foreboding manner. This history includes telling us that Godzilla is a super-predator. Doesn't that imply that Godzilla wants to eat the other monsters? Anyhoo, let's move on and talk about Elizabeth Olsen. Poor girl. I think someone forgot she was even in the movie. She vanishes for long stretches then shows up and looks scared for a minute before disappearing again. If you want to see her effectively looking scared, watch Silent House. Better yet, watch Martha Marcy May Marlene.



Later, we're just hanging with our wannabe hero as he tries to inject himself into the situation whenever possible. In case my description of him as a blank slate wasn't clear, he's about as interesting as, well, nothing. Seriously, he makes the comatose appear charismatic. His acting is nearly as bad. I literally spent much of the movie wondering who he had to blow to get this gig. Maybe I'm being too harsh. I actually liked him as the hero in Kick-Ass, but dammit I'm hot about this. It's not entirely his fault, though. Hollywood constantly mis-focuses its movies. The ones that should be smart, character studies are often turned into stupid actioners while those that should be flat out, balls-to-the-wall, mindless fun are handled like Shakespeare. Pacific Rim, anyone? Yeah, same issues. As if proving my point, we even get several instances of Godzilla being nice to our hero by going around him on the way to combat. By this time I was really hoping someone would poke my eyes out, but I persevered.

Eventually, we get a monster fight. Honestly, by this time it was far too late to save this duck from drowning. I was already pissed at every single person involved in bringing this abomination to the screen. Well, except for Bryan Cranston since he was the only enjoyable thing up to this point. Still, when I finally got to see Godzilla wailing on the other monsters, I perked up a bit. Then, I sank right back into my seat because, like a lot of the movie, it was too damn dark to see anything. I could barely make out what was going on. It sounded great, but as for what I was watching I can't be entirely sure. Even the cheesiest Godzilla flicks back in the day had the wisdom to include lots of humans shining spotlights on our combatants during night scenes. Here, we get a movie with a gazillion dollar budget, of which not one thin dime went to someone who though it might be a good idea for us to actually see the one part of the movie we came for. And then, as if the powers that be had been saving it for some grand finale, Godzilla breathes fire. No, wait. GODZILLA BREATHES FIRE! That's the way they want you to think of it. It's obvious they think the rest of the movie was some highly compelling and dramatic build up to this moment. No. That would require people who had a clue how to handle this material to be involved. Clearly, this isn't the case. The gist of this last paragraph is that I had to wait two f'n hours to see Godzilla do the thing for which he's most known. That, in a nutshell, is why this movie sucks.


12 comments:

  1. Wow, that's certainly a lot of frustration to build up on Godzilla. I actually kinda enjoyed it in large part because of the human characters but that might just be my personal tastes (even in an action film I often find I prefer to have a plot and some character development than just two hours of random monsters I don't really know that well beating the crap out of each other) but I could see why a fan of the older Godzilla movies might feel that way. I've seen some of the Gamera movies (which I think were supposed to be a knock-off of the Godzilla franchise) but that's not quite the same thing.

    Man, it's a shame I didn't find out about this sooner. I would have had more time to think about it and perhaps come up with something. Maybe if I can find time today I'll come up with something. Incidentally, you might also be excited to know I have two new blogathons starting tonight, both following up on my hugely successful Women in Film Blogathon. You might want to keep an eye out for those.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This movie just rubbed me the wrong way the entire time it was on. I wouldn't mind the human drama if it were well done, but I didn't find that to be the case. So, in essence, I got two hours of following around a guy I didn't care for run around trying to put himself in harm's way. No thanks.

      I'll definitely check out the blogathons. Hopefully, I'll be starting another of my own, soon.

      Delete
  2. This movie was so awful - the human characters had less personality than Godzilla. The only good thing that came from that film is the hilarious Honest trailer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What a hilarious post! :) Now I need to look up the Honest trailer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. That trailer perfectly sums up everything in this post.

      Delete
  4. Sitting in the theatre watching this, a paraphrase of a line from Jurassic Park came to mind, "Eventually you do plan to have Godzilla in your Godzilla movie, right?"

    - Cody

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally agree. All I can say is thank goodness I didn't pay for tickets to this train wreck.

      Delete
  5. I left the theater shaking my head. They decided to withhold Godzilla from us...in a movie called Godzilla. Starring Godzilla.

    And people liked it.

    I didn't go back and read my post, but if I remember correctly...I even hated Cranston, which I'm pretty sure if a punishable offense as a movie blogger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Makes no sense to me, either. I was left wondering if I'd somehow watched the wrong movie.

      Delete
  6. Those scenes where we're about to witness this epic monster Godzilla be awesome and then get cut by closing doors...so frustrating! It's like watching a boxing match when someone's about to throw this punch that would knock the socks out of his opponent...just when someone blocks your view! I expected there to be more smashing, destroying, roaring, but it was very limited. Sometimes all people want are those things in a monster movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, at least watching the boxing match if that hellacious punch really does do some damage you'll get to see the replay. No such luck, here.

      Delete